Over the last few years there has been a lot of talk of "linux on the desktop", however it seems like not a lot has happened, despite all the talk and all the promises that "this is the year when it will take off", Linux on the desktop is still only on the enthusiasts desktop.
In the beginning the reason given for the lack of uptake was that it was too difficult for the average user to install and to use and the switch from Windows was too complicated. But in the last couple of years we have seen Linux distributions that actually are quite user friendly and that I would expect even non-tech savvy users would be able to install and use. Ubuntu being the prime example of this type of distribution. Surprisingly at the same time, it seems like the calls for near Linux world domination has quieted down as well...
The focus of most distributions has been to add functionality and to look as much as Windows as possible (while adding it's own unique feel) to make the transition transparent and to prevent expected complaints of "why can't I do in Linux what I can do in Windows". While this approach is understandable and to a large degree necessary it is also unambitious. For me it begs the question of why would anyone switch if I don't get any more than I already have.
The converted will reply that you do get more: No viruses, it is free, masses of software, the ability to run on older hardware etc. But to be honest is that enough to start the revolution (an a revolution is needed!) of switching users from Windows to Linux in numbers that are meaningful?
I don't think so...
No comments:
Post a Comment